What makes an outstanding performer a star? Let's be clear there is a distinct difference between a star and a celebrity. Celebrities are pure products of publicity and marketing. They shine and fade as quickly as this year's patent shoes on the runway. A star has talent that can endure the test of time. Of course their stardom is also built upon signficant marketing investment but their achievements are cherished long after their recording companies, agent and marketing manager have shifted their focus onto the next big talent.
Unfortunately, in our celebrity-crazed culture, many people consume stars like they consume any global brands. A case in point, when Mutter played Brahm's violin concerto with the Toronto Symphony Orchestra last Friday, the hall was full and the audience cheered her warmly. After the intermission, the rows in the auditorium were punctured by empty seats. The people who left clearly decided Mutter was the only reason to attend the concert that evening.
Such attitude was very unfortunate because as it turned out, the orchestra gave a much more brilliant performance on their own, as if they were liberated from the shadow of an international star. People seem to forget a star does not necessarily guarantee a good show. In the case of last Friday's concert, Mutter's performance was exquisite. Every line, every turn of phrase and even every pause was thoughtful, masterful and personal. Yet even a genius could not establish rapport with a 100 musicians in a matter of hours, which was typically how much rehearsal time an international artist would have on tour.
On their own, the orchestra delivered a bold, robust and engaging Picture at Exhibition. One could feel their love for the music and their exhilarating enthusiam from across the hall. Those who stayed for only the first half of the show saw their star and missed the music.
